Smart Aerial Defense Doesn’t Start with Technology – It Starts with Understanding the Need

In recent months, alongside a dramatic rise in requests for counter-drone systems, we’ve been working closely with a wide range of clients – from security agencies in various countries to municipalities and private companies – and we’ve identified a recurring pattern:
Clients often approach us with an initial request for a system they’ve seen or heard about, but often, the system they’re asking for isn’t actually suited to their real needs.

“We frequently see clients requesting impressive systems with advanced technological capabilities, but those solutions aren’t always aligned with their specific needs. For example, long-range systems requested for dense urban areas, or tactical, manual systems at sites with no available operators – these setups simply won’t work,” shares Yogev Yadin, Regional Director at Skylock, a global leader in the counter-drone sector.

“There are times we’ve had to tell a client that the best-fitting system for their situation is significantly cheaper than the one they originally requested – and still offers a more effective solution to the threats they face,” he adds.

To help save time, money, and frustration, we’ve outlined several key considerations every client should review when selecting or evaluating the right counter-drone system:


1. What’s the Actual Threat Level?

First and foremost – what type of threat are you looking to counter?
Are you dealing with commercial drones for photography? The threat of explosive drones? Drones used for intelligence gathering? Or commercial drones violating restricted airspace (airports etc)?
Each type of threat requires a specific solution, and understanding the operational context is just as crucial as the technology itself.


2. Where Will the System Be Deployed? Urban, Open Areas, or Near Crowds

A system that performs well in open terrain may not function effectively in a dense urban environment. Line of sight, RF interference, and signal saturation all introduce unique challenges that require customized solutions.
Shay Degani, Presales Team Leader at Skylock, explains:

“In many cases, we send out our technical teams to perform on-site surveys to evaluate all environmental aspects. This ensures the solution is optimized both for the client’s needs and the specific deployment location.”


3. Who Will Operate the System? Trained Personnel or On-Site Staff?

A system with a complex interface may work well for experienced technical teams, but at sites with limited or no staff, a simple, automated solution is essential.

“It might seem obvious, but many facilities don’t have personnel available to maintain the system regularly,” adds Yogev. “That’s why a user-friendly interface and automated alerts make the difference between a system that works and one that fails to provide proper protection.”


4. Regulatory Constraints – Is Jamming Allowed?

RF jamming is a sensitive and often restricted method. It’s critical to understand the local regulatory environment, particularly in countries where disrupting radio frequencies requires special approval.
Having these checks conducted by the client or their representatives early in the process can prevent future complications, especially in regions where jamming technologies are prohibited.


5. Integration Requirements – How Does the System Communicate with Existing Infrastructure?

Counter-drone systems are often part of a broader security ecosystem that includes control centers, cameras, and remote monitoring. It’s essential to verify integration capabilities (APIs), compatibility with existing systems, and whether additional equipment is needed.


6. Soft vs. Hard Kill?

Many systems focus on “soft” kill solutions – detection, alerts, and RF jamming to disrupt the drone’s function.
In some scenarios, however, that level of defense is insufficient, especially when dealing with armed or autonomous drones that don’t rely on communication signals.

“Clients quickly realize that even with strong detection, soft neutralization isn’t always enough,” explains Yogev. “You may need a physical solution – a Hard Kill system that can physically eliminate the threat.”

A proper balance of soft and hard kill capabilities delivers a more comprehensive defense – tailored to various threat types and increasing the chances of success in real time.


In Conclusion

Counter-drone systems aren’t a plug-and-play solution. They require accurate adaptation to the environment, threat level, and operational context.
A professional approach that thoroughly understands the client’s true needs is the only way to ensure the investment delivers real value and results.

“At Skylock, we support dozens of projects worldwide – from the initial assessment and system customization through deployment and post-sale support. Our experience proves: when done right, aerial defense leads to genuine operational peace of mind.”

Moran Shlobscky, Marketing Manager

Looking for the right counter-drone solution? Let’s talk- Contact – Skylock

Skip to content